# Patch/performance bank selection behavior // suggestion **URL:** \ **Category:** Super Gemini\ **Created:** [7 October 2024 01:06 UTC](https://forum.udo-audio.com/t/patch-performance-bank-selection-behavior-suggestion/2943 "2024-10-07T01:06:27Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 4\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![calmberry](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.udo-audio.com/calmberry/32/671_2.png) [@calmberry](https://forum.udo-audio.com/u/calmberry)\ **Post date:** [7 October 2024 01:06 UTC](https://forum.udo-audio.com/t/patch-performance-bank-selection-behavior-suggestion/2943/1 "2024-10-07T01:06:27Z")
I’ve had my Super Gemini for a few days now and am really loving it. I spent some time editing performances today and encountered (what I think is) counterintuitive behavior. 1. I loaded a performance from bank A as a starting point, and edited each of the patches. 2. I loaded a patch preset from patch bank A into the upper layer. 3. I wanted to save my new performance in bank B, as all the slots in bank A are filled with factory presets–I thought I could do this by holding shift and pressing the performance button. I accidentally pressed the performance button twice while holding shift. Instead of switching between banks A and B, this action defaults to comparing the current/memory performance, and overwrote the performance I wanted to save. This is a pretty minor thing, but I think it’d be more intuitive to swap between the A and B banks (for patches and performances) as long as shift is held. As it is now, the first press is considered a bank swap, and the second is considered a current/memory load. Now I know not to do that–just a small suggestion for the future. ---
**Author:** ![Quatschmacher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/85e7bf/32.png) [@Quatschmacher](https://forum.udo-audio.com/u/Quatschmacher)\ **Post date:** [7 October 2024 01:44 UTC](https://forum.udo-audio.com/t/patch-performance-bank-selection-behavior-suggestion/2943/2 "2024-10-07T01:44:39Z")
I’ve been thrown by that too. Haven’t lost work thankfully. It does seem a bit odd because in all other instances shift remains active if one holds the button. ---
**Author:** ![HMan](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.udo-audio.com/hman/32/906_2.png) [@HMan](https://forum.udo-audio.com/u/HMan)\ **Post date:** [7 October 2024 08:48 UTC](https://forum.udo-audio.com/t/patch-performance-bank-selection-behavior-suggestion/2943/3 "2024-10-07T08:48:42Z")
I just got my SG on Friday, loving it too 😄 Managing performances vs patches threw me for a moment as well, it’s a step up from the Super 6. I was wondering why the SG uses shift to change banks vs the way the Super 6 works, by a double tapping the button. That seems like the most intuitive way, bypassing the shift button altogether. But maybe I’m missing something. ---
**Author:** ![Quatschmacher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/85e7bf/32.png) [@Quatschmacher](https://forum.udo-audio.com/u/Quatschmacher)\ **Post date:** [7 October 2024 17:34 UTC](https://forum.udo-audio.com/t/patch-performance-bank-selection-behavior-suggestion/2943/4 "2024-10-07T17:34:24Z")
The S6 doesn’t have “performances” so pressing the “patch” button can have a direct action. On the Gemini/8 when one is in a performance, a single press of the “patch” button is required to put it in patch selection mode, which is required in order to populate both parts of the performance.